![]() ![]() At operations by CCN in Laos they had available air assets from SPAD units, fixed wing gunships or even fighter bombers. Sometimes the SF people could send in a ‘Bright Light’ team to effect recovery or rescue. ![]() This was infrequent but did happen once that I know of. If we had insufficient assets on site, Army assets or other units could assist. So, if we went down, we had to use our own assets to retrieve our crews. and Sihanouk that no fixed-wing aircraft, other than forwarding air controllers, could operate in Cambodia. At least while operating in Cambodia with. €œAs far as contingency plans if we went down: we were on our own. Having two engines also offered the special operations aviators more peace of mind since if one failed or was shot during an operation across the fence, they had a good chance of getting back to base.īut newer and more technologically advanced didn’t necessarily translate into more effective in the field. Two engines offered Green Hornets increased horsepower, and thus speed, while the cabin was also larger, allowing for more troops. In 1971, the Air Force decommissioned the “P†model and replaced it with the newer UH-1N, which packed a twin-engine. Unfortunately, its axial compressor (unlike the rugged centrifugal army Huey’s compressors) was prone to damage from the dust of the Central Highlands which led to several crashes,†Rivero said. €œ a lot more powerful than the Army’s T-53 engine. ![]() The UH-1P used the General Electric’s T-58 engine, which could muster a powerful 1,300 horsepower. Initially, Green Hornets used the UH-1P Huey, which was essentially an “F†model modified with the “Lucky Tiger†modification that included additional mission-specific weaponry. Special operations helicopters were often the only lifeline to SOG recon teams on the ground. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |